PayU Worst Interview Experience | SSE | Bangalore | Awaiting

payu logo
payu
SDE IIBangalore2.9 yearsOngoing
July 30, 20243 reads

Summary

My interview experience at PayU for an SSE role was quite challenging, marked by disagreements with the interviewer on standard DSA problems and a perceived lack of understanding on their part, leading to an overall negative impression.

Full Experience

I recently interviewed at PayU for an SSE role in Bangalore. I have 2.9 years of experience as an SDE1 at a product-based MNC.

The interview consisted of one problem-solving/data structures round. It started with introductions and a discussion about my projects.

Then, the interviewer presented two DSA questions. For the first question, I initially proposed an O(n^3) solution and then optimized it to O(n). I discussed the approach, and the interviewer asked me to code it on Google Docs. After completing the code, we dry ran it on a few test cases. The interviewer pointed out that my implementation was incorrect because it didn't explicitly maintain i, j, k. I tried to explain that the problem only required a boolean return value, but he disagreed. With 15 minutes left, he moved on to the next question without letting me finish discussing the first one.

For the second question, I solved it optimally using a sliding window approach on the first attempt. The interviewer asked for the time and space complexity. I explained that it was O(n), but he insisted it should be O(n^2) because of the use of two loops. Despite my efforts to clarify that the worst-case scenario involves iterating over the entire array twice, he didn't understand and abruptly ended the interview.

I honestly hope I don't get selected for this role.

Interview Questions (2)

Q1
Increasing Triplet Subsequence
Data Structures & AlgorithmsMedium

The interviewer presented a problem where I needed to determine if there exists a triplet of indices (i, j, k) such that i < j < k and nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k]. I initially came up with an O(n^3) solution and then optimized it to O(n). I coded it on Google Docs and dry-ran it. The interviewer disagreed with my O(n) implementation, believing it didn't explicitly maintain i, j, k, even though the problem only required a boolean return.

Q2
Maximum Number of Vowels in a Substring of Given Length
Data Structures & AlgorithmsMedium

I was asked to find the maximum number of vowel letters in any substring of a given length. I solved this question optimally using a sliding window approach on the first attempt. When asked about time and space complexity, I stated O(n), but the interviewer insisted it was O(n^2) due to two loops, despite my clarifications.

Discussion (0)

Share your thoughts and ask questions

Join the Discussion

Sign in with Google to share your thoughts and ask questions

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts and start the discussion!