Cisco Interview Experience

I recently had the opportunity to interview with Cisco for the Analyst role. What made this entire process stand out was how Cisco prioritized fairness and unbiased evaluation right from the beginning.

Before I could even submit my resume, Cisco asked all candidates to remove any personal identifiers, such as name, contact details, CGPA, college name, or even references to specific clubs or events in order to eliminate any form of conscious or unconscious bias. It was the first time I had come across such a transparent and structured approach, and it already reflected a lot about their culture. The entire process consisted of four stages (all eliminatory): Group Discussion (GD), Technical Interview, Managerial Interview, and HR/ETR Round, each testing different aspects, from communication and analytical thinking to cultural fit and problem-solving mindset.

---

Round 1: Group Discussion

Duration: ~90 seconds per participant
Focus Areas: Communication clarity, confidence, and structure of thought

This was the first screening stage, where around 75 candidates were divided into 6 groups of 12–13 members each. Every participant was given a random topic and had to speak for about 90 seconds. My topic was News Channel vs Newspaper.
I focused my speech on the importance of authenticity over medium, emphasizing that credibility of information matters more than the format it’s delivered in. I also discussed how rural vs urban access shapes our preference for digital or print media. The panel appreciated how I balanced both perspectives and kept my response structured and time-bound.

After this round, around 50 candidates were shortlisted for the next stage.

---

Round 2: Technical Round

Duration: ~55 minutes
Focus Areas: Analytical thinking, Technical Problem-Solving, and Core Computer Science Fundamentals

The interview began with a quick introduction, followed by a discussion on my project. The interviewer wanted to understand my contribution, technical design decisions, and how I handled challenges.
I explained how I developed a full-stack web application using Node.js, Express, and MongoDB, emphasizing route structuring, query optimization, and overall scalability. The interviewer asked follow-up questions about authentication strategies, handling concurrent requests, and optimizing database performance through indexing.
In another backend-focused project, I discussed implementing a microservices architecture, where the conversation centered on my decision to decouple modules, the inter-service communication methods used, and the fault tolerance mechanisms designed to enhance reliability and resilience.

Then we switched to problem-solving. I was asked two analytical coding questions:

1. Find the smallest subarray with sum greater than X (I implemented a sliding window approach and derived an optimal solution).
2. Minimum number of platforms required for trains (I started with a brute-force solution, then moved toward an optimized two-pointer approach).

I explained both solutions end-to-end with complexity analysis and optimization reasoning, which the interviewer appreciated. We wrapped up with a few theoretical questions on CN, SQL joins, normalization, and REST APIs.

About 19 candidates advanced to the next round.

---

Round 3: Managerial Round

Duration: ~45 minutes
Focus Areas: Decision-making, communication, and handling ambiguity

This round was conducted by a senior manager who seemed very focused on understanding how I think and operate within a team. She began by asking about my motivations, how I balance multiple responsibilities, and what kind of work excites me the most.

Then came situational questions like:

• Tell me about a time when things didn’t go as planned in a project.
• How do you handle it when you don’t know something but are expected to deliver?
• What’s the biggest challenge you’ve faced while leading a team?

I shared real experiences, for instance, when integrating multiple microservices in a backend project led to deployment challenges, and how I systematically debugged the issue by isolating services and analyzing logs. I also talked about how I handled collaboration challenges during team-based hackathons by dynamically reassigning tasks to align with each member’s strengths.
This round ended with a short but interesting discussion about data-backed decision-making. She wanted to know how I’d use data to identify trends or drive improvements in a business process. I explained how, in one of my projects, I explored feature correlations and interpreted them beyond just the numbers, connecting them to real-world behaviour.

After this, 8 candidates were selected for the final round.

---

Round 4: HR/ETR Round

Duration: ~30 minutes
Focus Areas: Fitment, logistics, and expectations

This was the most conversational round. The HR began with her introduction, followed by:

• Tell me about yourself.
• What is Cisco known for?
• Who are Cisco’s main competitors?
• What are your future aspirations?
• Why do you want to take up a role immediately after graduation?

I kept my answers honest and straightforward, explaining how I wanted to apply my technical and analytical skills in real-world business settings and learn from industry leaders.

Then she discussed compensation details, internship duration (January–July), work location, and asked if my college would provide an NOC (No Objection Certificate). I told her that I was open to relocation and that my college supported long-term internships for final-year students.

We ended with me asking, What does Cisco expect from me as an intern?, to which she replied, Just come with an open mind and willingness to learn. It was a calm, engaging end to what had been an extremely thorough process.

---

Verdict: Selected✅ (but went with Apple)

I was thrilled to learn I’d been selected, but I ultimately decided to pursue another opportunity at Apple, which I’ve discussed in my previous post.
Still, Cisco’s process remains one of the most unique and thoughtfully designed experiences I’ve been through. Every interviewer genuinely tried to understand how I think, not just what I know, and that made it feel more like a professional dialogue than a test.